<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>just one anna &#187; responsibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justoneanna.com/tag/responsibility/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justoneanna.com</link>
	<description>with way too many hobbies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:51:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Before Somebody Lifted the Lorax Away</title>
		<link>http://justoneanna.com/life/before-somebody-lifted-the-lorax-away?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=before-somebody-lifted-the-lorax-away</link>
		<comments>http://justoneanna.com/life/before-somebody-lifted-the-lorax-away#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banned books week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ignorance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the lorax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truffula]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justoneanna.com/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the far end of town, where the Grickle-grass grows and the wind smells slow-and-sour when it blows and no birds ever sing excepting old crows&#8230; is the Street of the Lifted Lorax Everyone has books they remember as &#8220;making a difference&#8221;. Well, ok maybe not everyone, but I&#8217;d wish that fate on everyone, so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/banned/bannedbooksweek/index.cfm"><img class="size-medium wp-image-222 aligncenter" title="bbw_lorax_lg" src="http://justoneanna.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/bbw_lorax_lg-239x300.jpg" alt="bbw_lorax_lg" width="239" height="300" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>At the far end of town, where the Grickle-grass grows<br />
and the wind smells slow-and-sour when it blows<br />
and no birds ever sing excepting old crows&#8230; is the Street of the Lifted Lorax</em></p>
<p>Everyone has books they remember as &#8220;making a difference&#8221;.</p>
<p><em>Well, ok maybe not everyone, but I&#8217;d wish that fate on everyone, so I&#8217;ll leave it. </em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.geocities.com/kellster.geo/lorax.html"><em>The Lorax</em></a></span> was one of those books for me.  I can remember reading it for the first time, and thinking &#8220;This isn&#8217;t like I expected it to be.  It doesn&#8217;t have a happy ending.  Dr. Seuss books are supposed to have happy endings.&#8221;  Maybe that&#8217;s why it mattered, as a 9 year old (or 11 year old, or whatever. I don&#8217;t know exactly when I first read it).  Maybe it mattered because I&#8217;ve loved trees since I was very small, thanks either to some innate tree-hugger gene or because my father also loves trees and caring for them, or both.  But I can remember coming away from this book with a better perspective on the world.</p>
<p>A powerful thing, that.</p>
<p>This week is <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/banned/bannedbooksweek/index.cfm">Banned Books Week</a></span>.  Many of the books on the list are ones that I am a more well-rounded human for having read.  <em>To Kill a Mockingbird</em>. <em>On the Road</em>. <em>The Sound and the Fury</em>. <em>Brave New World</em>. <em>The Lord of the Rings</em>. <em>The Lorax</em>.</p>
<p>Many of those books I read at home &#8211; some of them probably younger than my Conservative WASP School District would&#8217;ve liked.  But my parents knew their child &#8211; and knew what I could and couldn&#8217;t handle.  When I read<em> The Lord of the Rings</em> with my dad, he used it to talk to me about evil, and about how the world is sometimes not a nice place.  In short, he used it as a way to both connect to his kid, and to help her grow up. I had similar conversations with my mom, when reading <em>Of Mice and Men</em> as a freshman in High School.</p>
<p>And I know, I was lucky.   I have amazing parents, and they did a good job.  But teachers can do this too (I got lucky in that front as well, having had some tremendous literature teachers throughout my schooling).</p>
<p>A lot of times, book banning is done to &#8220;PROTECT THE CHILDREN&#8221;.</p>
<p>Bull-honkey.</p>
<p>Should a 5 year old be reading <em>The Sound and the Fury</em>?  Probably not.  Would a 5 year old understand it?  Uh&#8230; probably not.</p>
<p>Books are some of the best teaching tools for helping people expand their minds, for presenting something outside of what they normally experience.  Reading <em>To Kill a Mockingbird</em> and <em>The Adventures of Tom Sawyer</em> present racism /clearly/ as a bad thing.  I&#8217;m quite sure that nobody wants their children to be confronted with racism in their every day existence &#8211; but if they can learn about it from Scout and Tom and Huck, and see those negative effects in what is, essentially, a safe environment, isn&#8217;t that a good thing?</p>
<p>And sure, books that present difficult subjects should be presented to kids who are ready to start tackling those subjects &#8211; but banning them only serves to make those conversations more difficult.  Sheltering children doesn&#8217;t make the bad things in the world less bad &#8211; and without these kinds of discussions, how can we expect kids to magically come to the &#8220;good&#8221; conclusions?  Books present the &#8220;bad things&#8221; in a way that is relateable, and a way that is controllable.</p>
<p>Now don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I think parents need to have the final say in what their kids are or aren&#8217;t reading.  Who knows a kid better than his or her parents?  Sometimes kids aren&#8217;t ready for certain conversations &#8211; <strong><em>and that&#8217;s 100% ok</em></strong>.</p>
<p>But /banning/ the book says that it presents nothing good, that it can serve no purpose. Reading <em>To Kill a Mockingbird</em> isn&#8217;t going to turn kids into racists (and 90% chance says they&#8217;ve heard a racial slur before in their life, whether on TV or on the playground) &#8211; but banning books is a good way to take away those conversations, and make them impossible for kids who ARE ready.   <span id=":1cq">It&#8217;s fine to stop your own kids from reading something; that&#8217;s called responsible parenting. But to tell everyone else&#8217;s kids what they can and can&#8217;t read takes that decision away from <em>other</em> responsible parents.<br />
</span></p>
<p>Ignorance doesn&#8217;t solve anything.</p>
<p>Responsibility, however, does.</p>
<p><em>*Writing this post was hard, because this is a very emotionally charged subject for me.  I struggle to refrain from nerdraging about people banning The Lorax and other books I have loved and learned from.  I need to thank <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.falconesse.com">Falconesse </a></span>for helping me turn this into a productive post.  She is wise, you know!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justoneanna.com/life/before-somebody-lifted-the-lorax-away/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

